Just about every thinking individual in the United States has come to the conclusion that Global Warming is a crock. The vast majority of Americans have reached this conclusion and it just irks the living daylights out of the Socialist Left.
When you place environmentalism beside Socialism, and consider them, they are virtually the same.
Each wish to control society, especially any capitalist society.
Contrary to what you may think, or have been taught, Socialism hasn’t gone away, it simple moved to a new home, the environmental movement.
REAL scientist will tell you the climate is warming, slightly, simply because the sun is warming. Whoops, there goes the global warming hoax.
Now, as to the Kyoto Treaty:
That Kyoto Treaty would have creamed the economy of the US. Even Bill Clinton knew that. The Congress had the good sense to turn it down, flat…even while Clinton was still in the oval office.If you know anything, at all, about running a business, you know that the "cost of doing business" is pasted on to the consumer of the products that business produces.
So, when the “Greenies” scream, that Big Business will not pay the price to upgrade their equipment to meet the extremely high standards for clean air they endorse, just know that that claim is a crock, too. If you know business, you know the business will not bear that cost, but the consumers will bear that cost. When the consumer refuses to pay that increased cost, production is cut back. When production is cut back, jobs are cut back. It is a vicious cycle and, Dear Reader; it is a cycle, which would take us back to the Great Depression in just a few short years.
If these “Greenies” had the sense God gave a gnat, they’d know their demands would crash the US economy… unless, of course, that is exactly what they want. I choose to believe the latter.
So, look again at the "environmentalist movement" and compare it with the Socialists. Then decide for yourself if you really want to support a movement bent on the destruction of he US.
It would be near impossible to decide which is the more dangerous to the US… Environmentalism, or Islamofacism. Both want our destruction.
Longstreet
Thank you for explaining this. I had always thought the environemtal movement shared much the same philosophy as the socilaist movement. Your post above cements it for me. Now I understand why the Democrat Party supports the tree huggers. The tree huggers, socilaists and democrats are all the same entity. What an eye-opener. It has made my day!
ReplyDeleteThis enviromental stuff is crap. How mad does it make you to go to all the trouble of seperating plastics and metal cans and newspapers and place all that stuff in a recycle bin and your "garbage " in a different bin... roll, and carry, it to the street, see two different trucks come by and pick it up, and then... find out that both trucks are dumping their loads into the same landfill!
ReplyDeleteAdd to all this the fact that you are paying more in local taxes to have you crap recycled.
Some recycling, huh!!!
J. Davis
And to the both of you I say there is one world with FINITE resources available and if you truly feel that way, i want to know, How close you live to a landfill, a factory or a refinery? I want to know where the right to polute is in the constitution. Promote public welfare is. And promote public welfare is clean air, clean water not a freakin' check everymonth. If you want to call me a socialist because of this, fine it only shows how fascist the right is, it promote private power of corporations over the rights of individuals and I see you buy into it. The constitution does not apply to paper corporations only to flesh and blood citizens. Just my thought, Merry Christmas, peace and goodwill, even to you facists. I pray someday you guy will wake up and see the error in your ways.
ReplyDeleteMr Frank(?): Why can't you live in the real world with the rest of us. Your Utopia doesn't exist and never will.
ReplyDeleteWe conservatives, or facists, as you call us, live in the REAL world and play the hand that God dealt us. We don't demand a new deck, or that the deck be reshuffled. We ACCEPT WHAT IS AND deal with it.
Everytime you socialist guys open your mouths you set yourselves back 50 years. You are creating such ill will among Americans that it is lke inciting a riot.
The American people have heard your message and we have rejected it.
"Promote the public welfare" is in the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. The Declaration is a nice document but is not the law.
ReplyDeleteBeing an "enviornmentalist" has not always been a derogatory status. The nuts took over during the "Great Society"....the same time I DROPPED my long time membershhip in the Sierra Club. Today, "enviornmentalists" do great harmn to their cause; they can't see the forest for the trees.
ReplyDeleteThis post is so hysterically nonsensical, it makes one seriously question the writer's sanity.
ReplyDeleteThe idiocy starts in the first sentence: "Just about every thinking individual in the United States has come to the conclusion that Global Warming is a crock."
Tell me: are you an environmental scientist? Have you polled all Americans on this subject?
If you had actually bother to read some of the serious scientific literature (not just right-wing propaganda), you would learn that there is an ongoing debate about global climate change, with the consensus being that human influence (pollution, etc.) is indeed helping to change the climate. But as to what extent, it's unclear at this point.
Also, it is the Republican who want to crash the U.S. ecomony. That's why they're shipping good U.S. jobs overseas, passing tax cuts for the rich, removing the tax burden from U.S. corporations and putting it on the backs of the middle class, wasting money on pork barrel projects like "the bridge to nowhere", etc. etc. etc.
If you want to speak for the lunatic fringe, go ahead. But don't try to drag the rest of us down with you...
"Promote the public welfare" is in the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. The Declaration is a nice document but is not the law.
ReplyDeleteSorry, but it is in the Constitution. In the Preamble, defining the purpose for the having a Constitution in the first place.